"new foundations must give new math"
from "The Basic Picture. Structures for constructive
topology"
by Giovanni Sambin, Oxford University Press, forthcoming
To register send an e-mail to maietti @ math.unipd.it
Registration fee: 40 euros
(to be paid at arrival).
Dipartimento di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
University of Padova, Italy
AILA (Italian Association of Logic and Applications), whose first president was Giovanni Sambin (from 1987 to 1994).
Steve Vickers
Birmingham
On the trail of the Formal Topos
Grothendieck said the topos was more important than the site, and
in a sense this encapsulates the difference between impredicative
locales and predicative formal topology.
In the "propositional" case where the site is on a poset rather than
a more general category, it is unnecessary to work with the full topos
(of sheaves) because the frame (of opens) already contains enough
information.
The locale theorist follows the Grothendieck view by favouring the
frame, but the predicative mathematician is reluctant to do this -
the frame is impredicative - and so in effect stays with the site
as the formal topology.
But what about the general site? It might seem natural to study this
in predicative mathematics as a "Formal Topos".
I shall describe some sightings of this elusive creature (for example:
spaces of algebras and the symmetric topos) and some clues to its
whereabouts and habits.
The impredicative treatment, using toposes and frames, is naturally
easier and now comprises a large body of established results.
The predicative need always to work concretely with generators and
relations (which is what the site in effect provides) is an extra
layer of difficulty.
I shall survey some experiences of extracting predicative content
from the impredicative results, in particular through the notions
of bundle and geometricity. (By "bundle" I just mean continuous map,
but with the suggestion that the dependence of fibre on base point
gives the map a flavour of "variable space". By a key result that
goes back to Joyal/Tierney and earlier, localic bundles correspond
to conducting frame theory internally in a topos.)
I shall also suggest how abstract categorical accounts of "categories
of spaces" (e.g. Townsend, Taylor) provide signposts.